There is
an article on Yahoo Finance today by David Bach, who is rather optimistic about the current real estate market. I think he was trying to sell
his book. I haven't read the book, and from his arguments in the article, I can't really recommend it, either.
The aim of this blog is to look at facts objectively. The author bases his claims on five arguments below, to which I will add some comments. We will hopefully get a chance to revisit these issues in a more in-depth manner in the future.
1) The first statement that he makes is that owning a house is cheaper than renting. Is that really true? I believe he is more correct when he says that there are "certain circumstances in certain markets" where renting is more beneficial in the short run. Well, rent is relatively low these days, and some would say the housing market is overheated, w0uld now qualify as a certain circumstance in a certain market?
As a resident of the Bay Area, I know that you can easily rent a small two bedroom house for $1500/month these days. Just check
craigslist. But if you are looking for similar quality in a similar neighborhood, a condo might go for $350,000. For a
house, be prepared to pay much more than that. Also, an assumption of 5% per year for annual rent increase is a little high, don't you think?
2) Leverage is a two-edged sword. Sure, things are great when they are going the right way. Leverage magnifies your gains. But if things start going the other way, you can also be in deep trouble. If you like leverage that much,
foreign currency trading will actually allow you to win or lose that amount of money in a much shorter period of time. Though you shouldn't do it unless you know what you are doing.
3&4) It is true that homeowners have tax breaks, and renters usually don't. Though this is one factor into the entire equation, and you should take into account all the factors before you decide which option is better. By the way, he forgot to mention that homeowners have to pay property tax.
5) Are non-homeowners not savers too? If you are buying a house to live in, wouldn't your consumption go up? Think granite countertops, or that nice leather sofa. As a renter, I know that I rent at a lower standard than what I would buy at. I don't buy furniture that I would otherwise buy for my own house. Where does the extra money go? Into my bank account, into stocks, into bonds. If I keep this up, guess what? I'll be richer too! But the important thing is, which option saves more?
So, don't get excited about arguments that
sound right. Instead of taking someone's statement at face values, ask to see the numbers, and learn how to analyze them.